Lazarus, DNA 2018, full work
DNA · ancestry · migration · 2018

Lazarus

A collective body of works where DNA, ancestral movement, maps, faces and lost places begin to form one field of memory.
Following my explorations in DNA analysis, I began to trace the movements of my ancestors around the world. At a certain point it felt as if I was trying to resurrect the past.Lazarus · DNA 2018
This is a branch, not the trunk. Lazarus is the ancestral-recovery branch in which DNA analysis, maps, faces, named places and remembered ancestors join the older concerns of displacement, faith, archive and print.
The 2018 Lazarus page describes a collective body of works, not a single image. Kırkağaç, Kelempes and Ancestors belong inside that body because maps, lost places and remembered ancestral faces are central to the series.
Older root

Maps and inherited geography

Before Lazarus there were the personal maps, the lost places, the family stories and the recurring question of how a person carries geography after it has been lost or renamed.

This branch

Named places, ancestral faces

Kırkağaç, Kelempes, grandmother, grandfather and ancestor images are central here. They turn DNA from data into place, kinship, loss and survival.

Later branches

Public memory and witness

The same root later opens into Recovered Histories, the Istanbul work, foreign saints, illuminated surfaces and the wider archive ecology. Those are later branches, not replacements for this one.

Following my explorations in DNA analysis, I began tracing the movements of my ancestors around the world. I reached a point where it felt as if I was trying to resurrect the past. That is why the title became Lazarus. It names the act of restoring something lost, but also the melancholy that painful discoveries bring up.

Both my parents were refugees, escaping war and death. In this work I tried to portray that narrative, moving beyond the earlier Personal Maps, while keeping the connection with psychogeography and cultural history. The map did not disappear. It entered the face.

The names matter. Kırkağaç and Kelempes are not decorative references. They are part of the structure of the branch: named places where ancestry, refuge, displacement and the fragile survival of memory become visible. Boats, broken sculpture, mixed funerary stones, maps and faces all belong to this same field of remembered and lost ancestors.

Lazarus, DNA 2018, full work
I
Lazarus, the collective body

Lazarus is not just a single image. It names a collective body of works concerned with restoring what has been lost. In the main image, the head becomes a place of crossings, holding children, trees, boats, broken sculpture, stones and journeying figures.

The face becomes a terrain, not only a likeness.
Lazarus · DNA 2018.
Kırkağaç, Yiayia, Grandmother
II
Kırkağaç

This is a primary work in the branch. The map on the face and in the background points towards Izmir and to Kırkağaç, where my grandmother’s family had lived. The work is about my grandmother, but it is also about place, community, refuge and the conditions that allow people to survive.

A lost or threatened place becomes a face.
Yiayia / Grandmother, also carrying the name Kırkağaç.
Kelempes, Grandfather
III
Kelempes

The grandfather image belongs beside Kırkağaç and inside the same Lazarus branch. The portrait depicts my grandfather, but the title on the print is Kelempes, the place where he was born, now no longer on any map. That absence is central to the work.

The person and the lost place are held together.
Grandfather / Kelempes, limited edition hand-coloured screen print.
Yiorgos, with ancestor images in the leaves
IV
Ancestors

The ancestor images are primary, not background decoration. In later composite works, they sit in the leaves, in the beard, in the map and in the body of the image. They make the individual face porous, carrying earlier lives without reducing identity to a single origin.

The self is not alone. It is inhabited by inherited narratives.
Lazarus print shown as a finished work
V
From paper to witness

These works sit between the mapping works and the later public-history projects. They explain why the archive in later work is never only documentary. It is bodily, familial and emotionally charged.

This branch gives later civic work its ancestral pressure.
Large portrait banner installation from the same map-face language
VI
Into public scale

The vocabulary of face, map, fragment and historical pressure could become large enough to enter civic or educational space. This is one reason the branch matters. It shows how private ancestry could later move outward without losing its emotional source.

The branch does not replace the trunk. It makes one direction of growth visible.

Why this branch matters

Lazarus, Kırkağaç, Kelempes and the ancestor images should be read together. They form the DNA and ancestral-place branch of the wider practice.

This is where data becomes grief, where geography enters the face, and where named places become part of the visual structure of memory. It is personal cosmography, but it also tries to speak beyond the personal towards shared humanity.

To resurrect the past is not to make it whole again. It is to acknowledge loss before moving on, and to admit that some fragments still call to us. Looking carefully is one form of responsibility.

Lazarus · DNA 2018
Ancestry · Kırkağaç · Kelempes · maps · faces · psychogeography · print

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Knight, Death and the Devil

Our Lady of Lourdes